
And that, in hindsight, without any proceedings, however, awaited me as I believe many others, has been formulated. The only things the cardinal has been limited to say the detentions have been calls for voters and candidates, to respect " that content is essential, based on the primacy and centrality of the human person," not are "special rules of Catholic morality", but "elementary truths that concern our common humanity " .
Nothing more. Sure, well specified that the main problems affecting the family based on marriage and the respect for human life from conception until its natural end.
He hinted that perhaps is not really conducive to civil unions, preferring by far a society still based on marriage between man and woman. So what? What's that mean? Necessarily have to be on the side of civil unions to have licenses to liberalism and not be accused of obscurantism or worse? Or you can safely continue to believe that marriage between a man and woman is the foundation of society and that civil unions are nothing but a product of the relativistic positivism that raises any right to his own desire? He suggested perhaps
, Cardinal Ruini, who when he speaks of respect for life refers abortion practices, back in the limelight thanks to the controversy that arose with the parliamentary investigation on the law 194. But not only. It probably also refers to experiments on embryonic stem cells and "sweet death." For the second time, so what?
You can not? As before, you're forced to be on the side of political correctness or you can get married in the middle of the culture of life?
Indeed, precisely to avoid controversy, the Cardinal Runi had said that " in view of forthcoming elections confirm the first line of not involve us, as a Church and then as the clergy and ecclesial bodies, in any choice of political party or party. "
E allora io proprio non capisco le lamentele e le indignazioni che si sono levate a sinistra. Cosa hanno da blaterare?
Io, piuttosto, ho motivo di avercela con Ruini. Io dico, ma che ci voleva a dire qualcosa di più? Se proprio non voleva dire per chi votare, poteva almeno dire quali sono le forze politiche che propugnano idee diametralmente opposte a quelle su esposte… e magari anche a quale schieramento appartengono… Io dico, ma che ci voleva?
0 comments:
Post a Comment